[The following variables were computed by averaging the ratings of the two coders]	
aspect_id = unique ID for each thought listed
serial = participant unique serial ID					
TaxPosC - mentions taxes in a positive light. For example, "taxes are necessary" or "the tax isn't very much"
TaxNegC - mentions taxes in a negative light. For example, "we are taxed too much already" or "I don't want to pay the tax"
CostPosC	- mentions cost, price, or expense in a positive light. For example, "I have enough money to pay for it"
CostNegC	- mentions cost, price, or expense in a negative light. For example, "$8 is too much"
Accountability	- mentions or asks how the money will be spent, where it will go, etc. For example, "what will the offset actually do?"
EmotPosC	- The person gives a relatively non-reasoned, positive emotional response. For example, "Awesome!" or "Together we can do it." 
EmotNegC	- The person gives a relatively non-reasoned, negative emotional response. For example, "Bullshit!" or "This is ridiculous." 
EnvPosC - The person mentions the environment in a positive light. Example, "We need to protect the environment."
EnvNegC - The person mentions the environment in a negative light. Example, "All this environmentalism has gotten out of hand."
ProEnvC - Overall, the statement supports Flight B (the more expensive flight that includes the carbon tax or offset)
ProCheapC - Overall, the statement supports Flight A (the cheaper flight)
	•	C = these were computed by averaging the ratings of the two coders

[L is for lower-bound. Computed by taking the lower of the scores of the two coders (ie, being conservative)]
TaxPosL	
TaxNegL	
CostPosL	
CostNegL	
AccountabilityL	
EmotPosL	
EmotNegL	
EnvPosL	
EnvNegL	
ProEnvL	
ProCheapL
[U is for upper-bound. Computer by taking the higher of the scores of the two coders (ie, being liberal)]
TaxPosU	
TaxNegU	
CostPosU	
CostNegU	
AccountabilityU	
EmotPosU	
EmotNegU	
EnvPosU	
EnvNegU	
ProEnvU	
ProCheapU

*Variable naming is according to the description above for L and U.
